On Monday, I provided a fresh look at the situation 12 years later for someone who retired at the start of the year 2000.
I looked at the results for someone using a 4% withdrawal rate with inflation-adjusted withdrawal amounts who rebalances annually to an allocation of 50% stocks and 50% intermediate-term government bonds. The news was not as grim as I expected.
At the Early Retirement Forum, Running Man suggests that I cherry-picked my asset allocation to make things look better for the 2000 retiree. While it was not intentional, he may be right. Essentially, bonds have performed very well since 2000. He suggests that in 2000 a more common asset allocation would have been 75% stocks and 25% cash. He also says not to forget about fees. Now I will show results for a few more scenarios, and things are now looking much worse for 2000 retirees than I reported first.
About fees, I will consider a 1% annual fee. This can be interpreted as investors underforming the index returns by 1%. I mean, the fee is not offset by additional returns from the fund manager.
There are four tables below. The first is for 75% stocks/25% bills and a 1% fee. The 2000 retiree is in the worst shape of anyone after 12 years, with a current withdrawal rate already about 12.5%. These are not conditions that will allow for a sustainable 30 year retirement unless a market boom begins very soon.
The second table is still 75/25, but removes the fee. The current withdrawal rate falls a bit to 10.22%, but it is still dangerously high.
In the 3rd table, I look at 50% stocks and 50% cash. No bonds. No fee. Now the 2000 retiree is in a bit better shape than the 1937 retiree. The current withdrawal rate is 8.7%. But this is still uncomfortably high for someone only 12 years into retirement.
Finally, in the 4th table I add the 1% fee back to 50% stocks and 50% cash. The CWR is 10.48%.
|
Table 3.3a
Retirements Ranked By Lowest Remaining Real Wealth 12 Years After Retirement For 4% Withdrawal Rate, 75% S&P 500 & 25% 90-Day T-Bills, Inflation-Adjusted Withdrawals, 1% Annual Fee Using SBBI Data, 1926-2011, S&P 500 and Intermediate-Term Government Bonds |
|||||||
|
12 Years Later
(i.e. these numbers are from the start of 2012 for a 2000 retiree) |
|||||||
|
Rank
|
Ret. Year
|
Remain. Real Wealth (%)
|
Current Withdrawal Rate
|
Remain. Nominal Wealth (%)
|
Cyclically-Adjusted Price Earnings
Ratio (PE10)
|
Dividend Yield
|
10-Year Gov't Bond Yield
|
|
1
|
2000
|
32.0
|
12.49
|
41.7
|
21.21
|
2.06
|
1.97
|
|
2
|
1937
|
35.0
|
11.44
|
58.6
|
10.25
|
6.18
|
2.31
|
|
3
|
1973
|
36.3
|
11.02
|
86.5
|
10.00
|
4.41
|
11.38
|
|
4
|
1969
|
37.5
|
10.68
|
80.9
|
9.26
|
4.66
|
12.57
|
|
5
|
1968
|
37.8
|
10.58
|
75.5
|
8.85
|
5.14
|
10.80
|
|
6
|
1966
|
39.8
|
10.04
|
72.8
|
9.24
|
5.22
|
7.96
|
|
7
|
1970
|
42.4
|
9.45
|
96.9
|
7.39
|
5.68
|
14.59
|
|
8
|
1999
|
43.1
|
9.29
|
56.8
|
22.97
|
1.79
|
3.39
|
|
9
|
1972
|
45.3
|
8.83
|
107.6
|
9.89
|
4.28
|
11.67
|
|
10
|
1971
|
46.7
|
8.57
|
110.4
|
8.76
|
4.77
|
10.46
|
|
11
|
1967
|
48.0
|
8.33
|
90.7
|
9.26
|
5.12
|
9.10
|
|
12
|
1929
|
50.0
|
8.01
|
40.7
|
13.90
|
6.35
|
1.95
|
|
13
|
1965
|
50.8
|
7.87
|
90.3
|
11.44
|
3.95
|
7.21
|
|
14
|
1930
|
51.4
|
7.78
|
42.2
|
10.10
|
7.84
|
2.46
|
|
15
|
1964
|
56.1
|
7.13
|
94.3
|
11.19
|
3.80
|
7.74
|
|
Note: Data for PE10, Dividend Yield, and 10-Year Government Bond
Yield are the values for the January occurring 12 years later. This data is
from Robert Shiller's homepage.
|
|||||||
|
Table 3.3a
Retirements Ranked By Lowest Remaining Real Wealth 12 Years After Retirement For 4% Withdrawal Rate, 75% S&P 500 & 25% 90-Day T-Bills, Inflation-Adjusted Withdrawals, No Fee Using SBBI Data, 1926-2011, S&P 500 and Intermediate-Term Government Bonds |
|||||||
|
12 Years Later
(i.e. these numbers are from the start of 2012 for a 2000 retiree) |
|||||||
|
Rank
|
Ret. Year
|
Remain. Real Wealth (%)
|
Current Withdrawal Rate
|
Remain. Nominal Wealth (%)
|
Cyclically-Adjusted Price Earnings
Ratio (PE10)
|
Dividend Yield
|
10-Year Gov't Bond Yield
|
|
1
|
2000
|
39.1
|
10.22
|
51.0
|
21.21
|
2.06
|
1.97
|
|
2
|
1937
|
42.4
|
9.44
|
71.0
|
10.25
|
6.18
|
2.31
|
|
3
|
1973
|
44.6
|
8.96
|
106.4
|
10.00
|
4.41
|
11.38
|
|
4
|
1968
|
45.7
|
8.75
|
91.3
|
8.85
|
5.14
|
10.80
|
|
5
|
1969
|
45.7
|
8.75
|
98.8
|
9.26
|
4.66
|
12.57
|
|
6
|
1966
|
47.7
|
8.38
|
87.2
|
9.24
|
5.22
|
7.96
|
|
7
|
1970
|
50.8
|
7.87
|
116.3
|
7.39
|
5.68
|
14.59
|
|
8
|
1999
|
51.6
|
7.75
|
68.0
|
22.97
|
1.79
|
3.39
|
|
9
|
1972
|
54.8
|
7.30
|
130.2
|
9.89
|
4.28
|
11.67
|
|
10
|
1971
|
56.0
|
7.14
|
132.3
|
8.76
|
4.77
|
10.46
|
|
11
|
1967
|
57.0
|
7.02
|
107.6
|
9.26
|
5.12
|
9.10
|
|
12
|
1929
|
59.6
|
6.72
|
48.5
|
13.90
|
6.35
|
1.95
|
|
13
|
1965
|
60.4
|
6.62
|
107.3
|
11.44
|
3.95
|
7.21
|
|
14
|
1930
|
60.8
|
6.58
|
49.9
|
10.10
|
7.84
|
2.46
|
|
15
|
1964
|
66.0
|
6.06
|
110.9
|
11.19
|
3.80
|
7.74
|
|
Note: Data for PE10, Dividend Yield, and 10-Year Government Bond
Yield are the values for the January occurring 12 years later. This data is
from Robert Shiller's homepage.
|
|||||||
|
Table 3.3a
Retirements Ranked By Lowest Remaining Real Wealth 12 Years After Retirement For 4% Withdrawal Rate, 50% S&P 500 & 50% 90-Day T-Bills, Inflation-Adjusted Withdrawals, No Fee Using SBBI Data, 1926-2011, S&P 500 and Intermediate-Term Government Bonds |
|||||||
|
12 Years Later
(i.e. these numbers are from the start of 2012 for a 2000 retiree) |
|||||||
|
Rank
|
Ret. Year
|
Remain. Real Wealth (%)
|
Current Withdrawal Rate
|
Remain. Nominal Wealth (%)
|
Cyclically-Adjusted Price Earnings
Ratio (PE10)
|
Dividend Yield
|
10-Year Gov't Bond Yield
|
|
1
|
1937
|
38.7
|
10.34
|
64.8
|
10.25
|
6.18
|
2.31
|
|
2
|
2000
|
46.0
|
8.70
|
59.9
|
21.21
|
2.06
|
1.97
|
|
3
|
1969
|
49.7
|
8.05
|
107.4
|
9.26
|
4.66
|
12.57
|
|
4
|
1968
|
49.9
|
8.02
|
99.7
|
8.85
|
5.14
|
10.80
|
|
5
|
1973
|
50.7
|
7.89
|
120.8
|
10.00
|
4.41
|
11.38
|
|
6
|
1966
|
52.0
|
7.69
|
95.0
|
9.24
|
5.22
|
7.96
|
|
7
|
1970
|
53.1
|
7.53
|
121.6
|
7.39
|
5.68
|
14.59
|
|
8
|
1939
|
54.3
|
7.37
|
91.5
|
11.90
|
7.02
|
2.57
|
|
9
|
1936
|
55.1
|
7.26
|
85.7
|
10.42
|
5.66
|
2.44
|
|
10
|
1999
|
55.6
|
7.19
|
73.3
|
22.97
|
1.79
|
3.39
|
|
11
|
1972
|
56.6
|
7.07
|
134.4
|
9.89
|
4.28
|
11.67
|
|
12
|
1971
|
56.6
|
7.06
|
133.9
|
8.76
|
4.77
|
10.46
|
|
13
|
1940
|
57.8
|
6.92
|
103.6
|
12.53
|
5.83
|
2.68
|
|
14
|
1967
|
58.0
|
6.90
|
109.4
|
9.26
|
5.12
|
9.10
|
|
15
|
1965
|
61.3
|
6.53
|
108.9
|
11.44
|
3.95
|
7.21
|
|
Note: Data for PE10, Dividend Yield, and 10-Year Government Bond
Yield are the values for the January occurring 12 years later. This data is
from Robert Shiller's homepage.
|
|||||||
|
Table 3.3a
Retirements Ranked By Lowest Remaining Real Wealth 12 Years After Retirement For 4% Withdrawal Rate, 50% S&P 500 & 50% 90-Day T-Bills, Inflation-Adjusted Withdrawals, 1% Fees Using SBBI Data, 1926-2011, S&P 500 and Intermediate-Term Government Bonds |
|||||||
|
12 Years Later
(i.e. these numbers are from the start of 2012 for a 2000 retiree) |
|||||||
|
Rank
|
Ret. Year
|
Remain. Real Wealth (%)
|
Current Withdrawal Rate
|
Remain. Nominal Wealth (%)
|
Cyclically-Adjusted Price Earnings
Ratio (PE10)
|
Dividend Yield
|
10-Year Gov't Bond Yield
|
|
1
|
1937
|
31.9
|
12.53
|
53.5
|
10.25
|
6.18
|
2.31
|
|
2
|
2000
|
38.2
|
10.48
|
49.7
|
21.21
|
2.06
|
1.97
|
|
3
|
1969
|
41.1
|
9.72
|
88.9
|
9.26
|
4.66
|
12.57
|
|
4
|
1968
|
41.6
|
9.63
|
83.0
|
8.85
|
5.14
|
10.80
|
|
5
|
1973
|
41.8
|
9.58
|
99.6
|
10.00
|
4.41
|
11.38
|
|
6
|
1966
|
43.6
|
9.18
|
79.7
|
9.24
|
5.22
|
7.96
|
|
7
|
1970
|
44.4
|
9.01
|
101.6
|
7.39
|
5.68
|
14.59
|
|
8
|
1939
|
45.1
|
8.87
|
76.0
|
11.90
|
7.02
|
2.57
|
|
9
|
1936
|
46.4
|
8.62
|
72.2
|
10.42
|
5.66
|
2.44
|
|
10
|
1999
|
46.7
|
8.57
|
61.5
|
22.97
|
1.79
|
3.39
|
|
11
|
1972
|
47.0
|
8.51
|
111.7
|
9.89
|
4.28
|
11.67
|
|
12
|
1971
|
47.3
|
8.45
|
111.9
|
8.76
|
4.77
|
10.46
|
|
13
|
1940
|
48.1
|
8.32
|
86.2
|
12.53
|
5.83
|
2.68
|
|
14
|
1967
|
48.9
|
8.19
|
92.2
|
9.26
|
5.12
|
9.10
|
|
15
|
1965
|
51.7
|
7.74
|
91.8
|
11.44
|
3.95
|
7.21
|
|
Note: Data for PE10, Dividend Yield, and 10-Year Government Bond
Yield are the values for the January occurring 12 years later. This data is
from Robert Shiller's homepage.
|
|||||||
Wade, Most of this is a rearview mirror analysis. What do thinks look like if you look at the 2013 retiree, facing possible bond yields in negative territory for the next 10 years?
ReplyDeleteHi,
DeleteHaving the negative yields for 10 years and then reverting to historical averages is one of the scenarios we looked at in Table 2 of an article summarized here (table included):
http://wpfau.blogspot.jp/2013/01/new-research-article-4-rule-is-not-safe.html